vSphere 6.5: Failed to deploy OVF package from the Content Library

Working on automating the virtual machine (VM) provisioning from an OVF template in a content library in vSphere 6.5 Update 2, I ran across an interesting behaviour. Some virtual machines were created without any issues, whereas others have been failing with the error message ‘Failed to deploy OVF package.’



In the vpxd.log on vCenter Server, this error message looks as follows:

info vpxd[7F83D22C5700] [Originator@6876 sub=Default opID=SelectResourcePageMediator-validate-335519-ngc:70031913-ae-71-7e-92-01] [VpxLRO] — ERROR task-51355 — TEST-VM-01 — ResourcePool.ImportVAppLRO: vim.fault.OvfImportFailed:
–> Result:
–> (vim.fault.OvfImportFailed) {
–> faultCause = (vim.fault.NotFound) {
–> faultCause = (vmodl.MethodFault) null,
–> faultMessage = (vmodl.LocalizableMessage) [
–> (vmodl.LocalizableMessage) {
–> key = “com.vmware.ovfs.ovfs-main.ovfs.object_not_found”,
–> arg = (vmodl.KeyAnyValue) [
–> (vmodl.KeyAnyValue) {
–> key = “0”,
–> value = “/TEST-VM-01/nvram”
–> }
–> ],
–> message = “The specified object /TEST-VM-01/nvram could not be found.”
–> }
–> ]
–> msg = “The specified object /TEST-VM-01/nvram could not be found.”
–> },
–> faultMessage = <unset>
–> msg = “”
–> }
–> Args:

The NVRAM file contains information such as BIOS settings. As VMware states here, a new NVRAM file is created ‘when a virtual machine is migrated, migrated with vMotion, cloned or deployed from a template.’

Looking through the knowledge base articles on the vendor’s website, I have found the following hint in KB 2108718:

Error 2: Could not find the file

This issue occurs if the NVRAM file mentioned in the virtual machines configuration file(*.vmx) is not available anymore.

As you might know, templates are stored in OVF format in the content library. Two files compose a template: an OVF descriptor (.ovf) and a virtual disk file (.vmdk). During the VM provisioning phase, the settings listed in the OVF descriptor form the virtual machine’s configuration file (.vmx). So my assumption was that one of those settings caused a conflict that prevented vSphere from creating those VMs.

When we clone a template to the content library, only minimum required settings are stored in the OVF descriptor. However, there is an option available to include extra configuration.


I decided to compare a vanilla OVF descriptor with the one with extra settings. While doing this comparison, one particular line in the file with extra configuration caught my eye:

<vmw:ExtraConfig ovf:required=”false” vmw:key=”firmware” vmw:value=”efi”/>

For some reason, the provisioning task is not able to succeed in creating new virtual machines with the EFI firmware from the template in vSphere 6.5. This issue happens regardless of the guest operating system version and content library type (local or subscribed).

Surprisingly, I do not see any problem with deploying VMs with the EFI firmware from the content library in vSphere 6.0. I need some time to test this functionality in vSphere 6.7, before opening a support request with VMware.

Workaround: Feel free to use a PowerCLI script below to set the firmware type to EFI after provisioning a new VM.


VMware Tools 10.3.0: Additional considerations when updating Windows machines

Last week VMware released VMware Tools version 10.3.0.


Not only does it include new features and a security update to address an out-of-bounds read vulnerability, it also introduces a significant change in a way VMware Tools install to Windows operating systems. In some circumstances, VMware Tools 10.3.0 installation or upgrade can even fail, as documented in VMware KB 55798.

Please bear in mind that the installer size for Windows has almost doubled with this release (for example, the 64-bit version has 72.6 MB in size compared to 47.4 MB for version 10.2.5), as it includes the following additional software:

  • Microsoft Visual C++ 2017 Redistributable packages (both 32- and 64-bit versions),


  • VMware AppDefence (disabled by default).


As a result, VMware Tools require to reboot the operating system at least once before actually proceed with the software install or upgrade.


To reduce the maintenance window, the vendor’s recommendations are as follows:

  • Upgrade Windows with latest service pack available from Microsoft and install the Microsoft Visual C++ 2017 Redistributable manually before installing or upgrading to VMware Tools 10.3.x.

Note: If installing Microsoft Visual C++ 2017 Redistributable is not possible, consider installing the Windows Update KB2999226 manually to reduce the need for system restart in versions earlier to Windows 10.

  • When VMware Tools installation or upgrade is invoked with REBOOT=ReallySuppress argument and a system restart is required for completing Microsoft Visual C++ 2017 Redistributable install, re-attempt the VMware Tools installation or upgrade after restarting the Windows system. vSphere client can detect this situation by noticing no change in VMware Tools version and guestinfo.toolsInstallErrCode=3010 in the guest variables or in the advanced configuration of the virtual machine.

Note: When VMware Tools installation or upgrade is invoked without any arguments, a system restart may occur automatically to complete Microsoft Visual C++ 2017 Redistributable install. After Windows system restarts, re-attempt the VMware Tools installation or upgrade.

Also, VMware has enabled the receive data ring support for the VMXNET3 driver in Windows with this update. Thorough testing is required to understand how this change influences the virtual NIC performance.

vCenter Converter 6.2: Error 1053: The service did not respond to the start or control request in a timely fashion

I couldn’t believe something as simple as vCenter Converter Agent installation would cause me a headache. The service was properly registered on the remote machine. However, it was failing to start with the error message as follows:


For a moment I thought about any dependencies that VMware vCenter Converter Standalone Agent service could have, but it was a false assumption.


Looking for any hint from the community, I thought it might worth time to check the release notes for VMware vCenter Converter Standalone. To my great surprise, this issue has been documented as the known issue:


Who can imagine that the Internet access can be a requirement for this tool?

Gladly, it can be fixed with a workaround provided by VMware:

  1. Open HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control in the Windows Registry Editor and create or modify a ServicesPipeTimeout DWORD32 decimal value to at least 300000 (5 minutes).
  2. Restart the system for the changes to take effect.

16/08/2018 – Update 1: If any issues with VMware vCenter Converter Standalone, it makes sence to look into VMware KB 1016330 ‘Troubleshooting checklist for VMware Converter’ for possible solutions.

vSphere 6.0: The operation failed due to The operation is not allowed in the current state.

Working on the PowerCLI script to automate VM provisioning in vSphere 6.0, I ran across the following error message:


The script was simply creating a new virtual machine from the Content Library template.

New-VM -Name $vmName -VMHost $vmHost -Location $vmLocation -Datastore $vmDatastore -ContentLibraryItem $vmTemplate

Investigating this behaviour further, I have found that it was related to a failing cross vMotion placement. In vSphere Client those errors were looking like this:


It was then I concluded it might be related to DRS being disabled for that cluster. Setting DRS to the Manual mode resolved this issue.

The next step was to check whether this problem could be reproduced for other templates. Surprisingly, the VM provisioning from some of them went smoothly, regardless of the DRS status.

Remembering about my previous articles (here and here) related to the Content Library, I decided to have a look into the VM configuration files (*.ovf) for both templates to compare. The only difference was related to the following storage settings which exist for the faulty templates:

<vmw:StorageGroupSection ovf:required=”false” vmw:id=”group1″ vmw:name=”EMC VNX VM Storage Policy”>
<Info>Storage policy for group of disks</Info>
<vmw:Description>The EMC VNX VM Storage Policy storage policy group</vmw:Description>

<vmw:StorageSection ovf:required=”false” vmw:group=”group1″>
<Info>Storage policy group reference</Info>

As expected, removing those block of data from the OVF-file and re-uploading it to the Content Library resolved provisioning issue completely.

A couple of notes:

  • There is no way to identify any problems with the VM configuration using the Content Library configuration page or ‘New VM from Library…’ dialogue in vCenter Web Client.
  • Even if a modified OVF-file has been uploaded to the local Content Library, this change is not going to propagate to the subscribed ones. You need to repeat this process for all subscribed Content Libraries manually.

vSAN 6.6.1: Replacing a faulty NIC on Dell PowerEdge server

Not long ago I have noticed a 10G network interface flipping on one of the vSAN nodes.


I immediately started investigating this issue. An interesting thing was that this device was part of the integrated NIC on the server, and only it was generating connection errors.


After consulting with the Networks, we found the following:

  • The interface was up,
  • The port connecting to the switch had no traffic (can send to the server, but not receiving from the server),
  • No errors were recorded,
  • SFP signals were good.

The plan of attack was to replace SFPs – first on the server and, if it didn’t help, on the switch. During this operation we’ve found out the SFP on the server side was unusually warm. Unfortunately, replacing SFPs didn’t help and after approximately 15 minutes of complete silence, disconnects continued.

The next move was to contact a vendor. In our case, it was Dell EMC.

We’ve lodged a support request and sent the SupportAssist Collection to them. The response from the Support was to replace an embedded NIC with a new one. Considering the server was in use, it all sounded tricky to me.

However, thanks to the new algorithm which assigns device names for I/O devices beginning in ESXi 5.5, it all went smoothly. VMware states the following:


The number of ports on the embedded NIC hasn’t changed. As a result, hypervisor assigned the same aliases to the onboard ports.

ESXi initialised new ports and vSAN configuration was updated successfully without any human interaction.

As a bonus, when the server was booting after the card replacement, Lifecycle Controller detected an older version of firmware on the device and initiated a firmware update operation automatically.


All in all, I am impressed by how robust modern platforms both from Dell EMC and VMware.